Morgan Stanley IM: The Nuclear Revival – Embracing a Clean, Reliable and Safe Source of Energy

As the world gears up to tackle global warming, renewable energy sources such as solar, wind and hydro power are at the forefront of solutions offered to avert a climate catastrophe. Yet half a century after the environmental case for nuclear power first became clear, it is making a comeback, as a way to fight climate change.

22.09.2023 | 05:55 Uhr

Here you can find the complete article.

Given the challenges in quickly scaling renewable energy sources like solar, not to mention the increased geopolitical concerns around energy independence, it appears policy makers are finally waking up to the promise of nuclear power. French president Emmanuel Macron recently announced a €1 billion package of funding in support of small nuclear reactors, in addition to a pledge to construct 14 new generation reactors.1, 2 Newly elected South Korean President Yoon Sukyeol is aiming for nuclear to account for 30% of total power generation, a reversal in policy from the previous president.3 Japan, home to the 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident, recently restarted nuclear capacity.4

China intends to build more nuclear reactors over the next 15 years—150 in total—than the rest of the world combined has built over the last 35 years.5


Source: UN Economic Commission for Europe, 2021, “Life Cycle Assessment of Electricity Generation Options”.

Nuclear finally had a “seat at the table” during the recent UN Climate Change Conference in Glasgow6 and, perhaps most importantly, the European Commission recently ruled that nuclear energy may potentially be included in the EU Taxonomy as a “green” sustainable activity, which may increase project financing for nuclear power.7

Public perceptions are changing as well: in 2018, only 37% of Democrats in the U.S. supported nuclear power; now a full 60% do.8 Who would have predicted a few years ago that Germany’s decision to close down the last of its nuclear power plants would prompt the Washington Post editorial board to proclaim “What a mistake,” earlier this year?9 This says nothing of the more recent sharp U-turn in attitudes towards nuclear by many European governments as they revisit their reliance on Russian fossil fuels: Britain reversed plans to shut down its nuclear plants by 2030, and Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced an aim to increase the nuclear share of electricity from 15% to 25%.10 Belgium, which confirmed plans as recently as December of 2021 to close all nuclear reactors by 2025, similarly reversed course and decided to extend the life of its nuclear reactors an additional ten years.11

Below we discuss the benefits of nuclear power, including why we believe public fears are misguided, and how investors can gain exposure to this structural theme. As Lux Capital’s Josh Wolfe has suggested, perhaps a re-branding of this “elemental” power is needed to overcome legacy perceptions.12 It is time facts—not fear—drive our policy towards fighting climate change. Nuclear is carbon free, more reliable than other renewables, and possesses a strong safety track record, on par with solar and wind energy.



There is no assurance that a portfolio will achieve its investment objective. Portfolios are subject to market risk, which is the possibility that the market values of securities owned by the portfolio will decline and that the value of portfolio shares may therefore be less than what you paid for them. Market values can change daily due to economic and other events (e.g. natural disasters, health crises, terrorism, conflicts and social unrest) that affect markets, countries, companies or governments. It is difficult to predict the timing, duration, and potential adverse effects (e.g. portfolio liquidity) of events. Accordingly, you can lose money investing in this portfolio. Please be aware that this portfolio may be subject to certain additional risks. In general, equities securities’ values also fluctuate in response to activities specific to a company. Investments in foreign markets entail special risks such as currency, political, economic, market and liquidity risks. The risks of investing in emerging market countries are greater than the risks generally associated with investments in foreign developed countries. Stocks of small-and medium- capitalization companies entail special risks, such as limited product lines, markets, and financial resources, and greater market volatility than securities of larger, more-established companies. By investing in investment company securities, the portfolio is subject to the underlying risks of that investment company’s portfolio securities. In addition to the Portfolio’s fees and expenses, the Portfolio generally would bear its share of the investment company’s fees and expenses. Derivative instruments may disproportionately increase losses and have a significant impact on performance. They also may be subject to counterparty, liquidity, valuation, correlation and market risks. Illiquid securities may be more difficult to sell and value than publicly traded securities (liquidity risk). ESG Strategies that incorporate impact investing and/or Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) factors could result in relative investment performance deviating from other strategies or broad market benchmarks, depending on whether such sectors or investments are in or out of favor in the market. As a result, there is no assurance ESG strategies could result in more favorable investment performance.

1 Alderman, L. (2022, February 10). France announces major nuclear power buildup. The New York Times. Retrieved from world/europe/france-macron-nuclear-power.html#:~:text=President%20 Emmanuel%20Macron%20announced%20a,its%20reliance%20on%20 foreign%20energy.

2 Kar-Gupta, Sudip. (2021, November 9). Macron says France will build new nuclear energy reactors. Reuters. Retrieved from

3 Lee, H. (2022, March 9). South Korea’s Pro-Nuclear President-Elect Boosts Atomic Stocks. Retrieved from com/news/articles/2022-03-10/south-korea-s-pro-nuclear-president-elect- boosts-atomic-stocks

4 Obayashi, Y. (2021, October 5). Japan Eyes Renewables, nuclear restart in race for 2030 climate goal. Reuters. Retrieved from race-2030-climate-goal-2021-10-05/

5 Murtaugh, D. (2021, November 2). China’s Climate Goals Hinge on a $440 Billion Nuclear Buildout. Retrieved from nuclear-power-plan-to-rival-u-s

6 (2021, November 8). Nuclear energy gets a seat at COP26 table; to be part of solution to climate change. The Federal. Retrieved from

7 Abnett, K. (2022, February 2). EU proposes rules to label some gas and nuclear investments as Green. Reuters. Retrieved from investments-green-2022-02-02/

8 Hill, N. (2021, November 15). New American Climate Perspectives Survey. ecoAmerica. Retrieved from perspectives-survey-2021-vol-v/

9 Opinion | Germany is closing its last nuclear plants. What a mistake. The Washington Post (2021, December 31). Retrieved from plants-what-disaster/

10 Jolly, J. (2022, March 21). Johnson announces aim for UK to get 25% of electricity from Nuclear Power. The Guardian. Retrieved from energy-from-nuclear-power

11 Belgium reaches agreement on Nuclear Exit. The Brussels Times. (2021, December 23). Retrieved from belgium-reaches-agreement-on-nuclear-exit

12 Twitter. Retrieved from

Diesen Beitrag teilen: