Janus Henderson Investors: Fed watch - stealth yield curve control?

Janus Henderson Investors: Fed watch - stealth yield curve control?

Head of Global Bonds Nick Maroutsos describes the Fed decision in July to hold rates steady as a non-event given that the central bank, through its actions, has already proven its willingness to do whatever it takes to support the US economy during this unprecedented period.

31.07.2020 | 08:42 Uhr

Key takeaways

  • The decision by the US Federal Reserve (Fed) came as no surprise as the central bank has already telegraphed its intention to maintain highly accommodative policy as the US navigates the pandemic-driven economic slowdown.
  • Much attention will now return to Yield Curve Control as a potential next step, but we believe that such a programme is unnecessary given the sway the Fed already holds over markets.
  • While bond allocations have to work harder to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns, investors must also keep in mind the imperative of fixed income to provide diversification from riskier asset classes and to lower overall portfolio volatility.

The decision by the US Federal Reserve (Fed) at its July meeting to keep overnight lending rates between 0.00% and 0.25% was a non-event, in our view. But as evidenced by the level of attention showered upon the statement by Chairman Jerome Powell et al, it once again proved that within financial markets, the Fed pretty much is the only game in town.

Not out of the woods

Chairman Powell maintained his recent tone that the US economy remains mired in a significant slump as flagging demand due to the COVID-19 pandemic has weighed heavily on employment and business activity.

Consequently, the Fed stuck to its highly accommodative guidance and reiterated that it stands ready to utilise the full range of tools at its disposal to achieve its dual mandate of full employment and price stability.

Yet given the nature of this crisis and the potential for a second wave of the virus to emerge later in the year, we are asking the question, “What’s next?” After all, a US$7 trillion balance sheet may have been enough to support financial markets, but with an unemployment rate of 11.1%1 (18% when including those marginally attached to the workforce) – numbers that could rise as certain states seek to clamp down on an increase in infections – we can make the argument that much remains to be done to support the real economy.

1Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, standard U3 unemployment rate in June, Employment Situation Summary, 2 July 2020. The U6 unemployment rate, which additionally includes the underemployed, marginally attached, and discouraged workers was at 18% in June 2020, St Louis Fed.

Enter yield curve control

That bridge is likely an assurance to the corporate sector that borrowing conditions will remain favourable for the foreseeable future. One of the tools that has been suggested is yield curve control (YCC). In this programme, a central bank commits to maintaining interest rates within a certain band by whatever means necessary rather than simply committing to purchase a specific amount of assets, which may – or may not – result in the desired effects on rates. In the build-up to the Fed’s September meeting, we believe that calls for such a programme may increase and we will be listening to comments by Fed members addressing this subject over the next few weeks.

Go ahead, make my day

Implicit in YCC is a veiled threat that markets should not test a central bank’s resolve. Our view is that the Fed has already accomplished this task by indicating that they will keep rates steady through at least 2022 as well as by the speed – and dare we say comfort – with which it nearly doubled the size of its balance sheet over the past year. Given the pronounced rally in equity and corporate credit prices, the market clearly thinks so.

Further validating expectations of rates being set in stone over the medium term is some measures of bond market volatility reaching all-time lows. And by observing countries that have already instituted YCC – namely Japan and Australia – massive bond purchases have proven unnecessary as markets have been unwilling to take the opposite side of the ‘central bank trade.’ We imagine this would be even more the case in the US given the global sway held by the Fed and the US dollar. In short, YCC in the US would at best be marginally effective, but likely completely unnecessary.

Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index & US Investment Grade Corporate Index total returns, 28 June 2019 = 0


Source: Bloomberg, as of 28 July 2020. Note: Move Index a measure of US Treasury market volatility.

A tough spot for bond investors

The Fed’s immense presence in financial markets not only distorts signals of economic health, inflation and company prospects, its suppression of yields has complicated the task of bond investors. Over the past decade, investors have grown used to diminished coupon levels in their fixed income holdings. To compensate for this, capital appreciation has come to represent a greater share of overall returns. Harvesting these returns was easier in the years leading up to 2015, before the Fed began raising overnight rates. During that period, steeper yield curves enabled prices on mid-dated bonds to rise as they neared maturity. While yields on 2-year US Treasuries have plunged in the wake of the pandemic, those on 10-year notes are not far behind, diminishing the roll-down potential as bonds mature.

Seeking greener pastures

With the world hungrier for yield, bond portfolios must work harder to deliver on their mandate of providing attractive levels of risk-adjusted returns. While we can argue the Fed had a hand in creating this problem, it has also provided part of the solution. That, in our view, is investment grade credits. Not only is the corporate yield curve steeper than that of Treasuries, but with the Fed’s implicit backing of the investment grade credit market – and we doubt the Fed has any interest in losing money on its investments – this segment of the market appears to offer attractive potential for capital appreciation with lower-than-usual risk of a material price decline thanks to the Fed’s largesse.

Similarly, countries such as Australia, New Zealand and many in Asia ex Japan offer opportunities to identify higher quality credits – often with quasi state backing – that trade at greater discounts to US peers of similar credit quality.

US Treasuries and investment grade corporate credit curves


Source: Bloomberg, as at 28 July 2020. Past performance is not a guide to future performance.

Maintaining perspective

While seeking to identify attractive risk-adjusted returns, we must not lose sight of the challenging environment in which we find ourselves. Virus cases are rising in the US; parts of Europe are seeing a re-emergence; and a vaccine is no sure thing. Lest we forget, the US finds itself in an election year with everything from taxes to trade and regulation on the table. Given this stew of potential risks, bond portfolios likely need to prioritise their ability to provide diversification from riskier assets and dampen volatility over the remainder of the year.

Diesen Beitrag teilen: