
This piece summarizes our engagement with a leading multinationalbeverage corporation we hold — including a site visit to the company’slargest franchise bottler’s Jundiaí facility in São Paulo.
19.06.2026 | 05:30 Uhr
As well asfollow-up discussions with the beverage company’s sustainabilityteam — to assess how potentially financially material operational riskssuch as water availability, packaging, and climate resilience are beingmanaged following the company’s December 2024 revision of severalsustainability targets.
Physical climate risks: terroir-dependentrisks and
opportunities
Physical climate risks — such as shifting temperature patterns, waterscarcity,
and soil degradation — are emerging as potentially financiallymaterial
considerations for global beverage producers. These risksare particularly
pronounced for companies whose products dependon specific growing conditions,
or terroir, where subtle environmentalchanges can affect quality, yields, and
brand integrity. Whileregulatory and transition risks often dominate climate
discussions, inthis piece we cover our engagements with two alcoholic
beveragecompanies, which focused on how physical climate impacts couldmanifest
across time horizons and how the companies are positioningthemselves to
mitigate these effects.
Cybersecurity: bending, not breaking
Given the increasing risk and relevance of cybersecurity for companieswithin
our portfolios, and the potentially financially material consequencesof a
cyberattack, we conducted a thematic engagement programme tobetter understand
how companies are managing the risk. Including a casestudy of a company
demonstrating mature cyber governance, this piececovers eight key takeaways
from the thematic engagement programme.
Supply chain resilience in the semiconductor sector
The semiconductor value chain remains one of the world’s most complex
andglobally interdependent manufacturing ecosystems. Recent geopolitical
tensions,export controls, energy constraints, and post-pandemic logistics
shocks havereinforced the need for robust, regionally diversified, and
technologically resilientsupply chains. Against this backdrop, we engaged with
three semiconductorcompanies we hold in our portfolios to assess how leading
companies are navigatingthese pressures. In this piece we look at how their
strategies highlight a spectrumof approaches, from parallel production capacity
and multi-sourcing to strategicpartnerships, regional clustering, and selective
technological substitution.
Responsible AI: transparency, governanceand
business-model resilience
Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping business models across sectors, from
HealthCare and Financial Services to digital content and entertainment. While
AI may bringmeaningful opportunities to improve efficiency, product innovation
and customerexperience, it also raises questions around transparency, data
governance, regulatorycompliance and long-term value protection, all of which
could pose potentially financiallymaterial risks to companies. In this piece we
outline our engagements with companies,which illustrate how responsible AI
considerations vary across sectors - and why robustoversight, disclosure and
long-term planning are becoming increasingly important.
Product safety in personal care
Given rising consumer scrutiny of cosmetic ingredients and a litigious
U.S.environment, in 2025 we held multiple engagements with a multinational
personalcare company we own, meeting with Investor Relations team, Chief
SustainabilityOfficer, and CEO to discuss product safety, ingredient
innovation, and transparency.The company continues to face product safety
litigation in the U.S. and broaderquestions from consumers and NGOs around
ingredient safety, which we believemay pose a potentially financially material
risk. In this piece we look at how thecompany is managing these risks.
Risk Considerations
There is no assurance that a portfolio will achieve its investment
objective. Portfolios are subject to market risk, which is the possibility that
the market value of securities owned by the portfolio will decline. Market
values can change daily due to economic and other events (e.g. natural
disasters, health crises, terrorism, conflicts and social unrest) that affect
markets, countries, companies or governments. It is difficult to predict the
timing, duration, and potential adverse effects (e.g. portfolio liquidity) of
events. Accordingly, you can lose money investing in this strategy. Please be
aware that this strategy may be subject to certain additional risks. Changes in
the worldwide economy, consumer spending, competition, demographics and
consumer preferences, government regulation and economic conditions may
adversely affect global franchise companies and may negatively impact the
strategy to a greater extent than if the strategy’s assets were invested in a
wider variety of companies. In general, equity securities’ values also
fluctuate in response to activities specific to a company. Investments in foreign
markets entail special risks such as currency, political, economic, and
market risks. Stocks of small- and mid-capitalisation companies carry
special risks, such as limited product lines, markets and financial resources,
and greater market volatility than securities of larger, more established
companies. The risks of investing in emerging market countries are
greater than risks associated with investments in foreign developed markets. Derivative
instruments may disproportionately increase losses and have a significant
impact on performance. They also may be subject to counterparty, liquidity,
valuation, correlation and market risks. Illiquid securities may be more
difficult to sell and value than publicly traded securities (liquidity risk).
Non-diversified portfolios often invest in a more limited number of issuers. As
such, changes in the financial condition or market value of a single issuer may
cause greater volatility. ESG strategies that incorporate impact
investing and/or Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) factors could
result in relative investment performance deviating from other strategies or
broad market benchmarks, depending on whether such sectors or investments are in
or out of favor in the market. As a result, there is no assurance ESG
strategies could result in more favorable investment performance.
Diesen Beitrag teilen: