- As
we enter the fourth year of this current bull market, investors appear to
be exhibiting classic late cycle behavior.1
- However,
the key question to answer is how long will the last stage of this
equity bull market last?
In other words, will this “euphoria” stage last three years as it did in
the late 1990s with the S&P appreciating nearly 100% before the
dot.com peak in early 2000?2
Or will it be more like 2021 when the euphoria bubble inflated so
quickly that the next bear market came on shortly thereafter, commencing
in early 2022?3 - In
2023, following the -25% bear market decline, the biggest pushback to my
bull thesis was the consistent refrain, "why should I buy equities
when I can lock in a 5% risk-free yield in short-term US Treasuries?"
That was classic early cycle behavior as investors
accepted lower upside in return for downside risk mitigation.
I remember a very successful advisor pal of mine grumbling that he had
become the "T-Bill rolling king".
That was 2023.
Not now. - In
late cycle equity bull markets, investors are not worried about downside
risk, but seek upside returns.
And the leadership increasingly morphs to the more speculative stocks.
Investors chase stocks that currently may not have good fundamentals (or
even any earnings) but rather have a bright story about the future.
Quantum computing, nuclear energy, rare earth materials and even flying
car stocks are some of the areas that come to mind currently.
That's never a great sign in my opinion, as it validates the late-cycle
thesis. - So
back to the question of where are we in the late cycle?
It is my belief that the more liquidity pumped into the economy, the
faster we move through the final phase.
I am worried about the Federal Reserve lowering interest rates combined
with fiscal policy stimulus coming early next year in the OBBB.4
That's a lot of liquidity.
The more liquidity, the higher the speculative stocks rise, in my opinion.
Remember the CARES Act and American Rescue Plans of 2021?
Approximately $4.1 trillion pumped into the U.S. economy.5
No wonder the bubble inflated so quickly.
And the faster that bubble inflates, the faster the market moves through
the "euphoria stage". - The
good news is that recently some of the air has been let out of the bubble.
Speculative stocks have taken a drubbing, down on average -17% from
their mid-October highs.6
Could it be that the market is factoring in the Fed might not cut in
December?
Therefore, the rate of liquidity flows could slow?
Hence, as pertaining to the stock market, I think a Fed pause would
be healthy for the duration of this bull market.
It would remind investors that you can lose a lot of money in
high-risk stocks.
Thereby slowing the movement through the last Euphoric stage. - While
too much liquidity is my biggest worry, what concerns me far less is the
perceived rich valuation of the S&P 500 overall.
Remember, valuation analysis is only as good as the fundamental
estimates.
I have argued since early April that Wall Street has been way too
bearish on the economic outlook and, therefore, earnings.
As a portfolio manager focused on actual companies, I enjoy, and
frequently find myself “in the weeds,” listening to company reports.
Not all companies have managed well through the tariff barrage, but
many have.
Especially the biggest of the large caps in the S&P 500 index. - We
have just exited the third straight quarter where overall earnings
significantly exceeded Wall Street's projections.
Since Wall Street analysts significantly reduced their earnings outlook in
April, they are now being forced to revise estimates upward.
An upward revision has occurred every week since July 11th.7 - The
only bubble in Ai is in bubble talk, in my opinion.
Those making analogies to the year 2000 are fear mongers.
The analogies, however, make for great media content.
As I compare where we are in the Ai rollout cycle today versus the
Internet introduction of the late 1990s, the dot.com bubble peaked when
the demand for Internet services and products no longer exceeded the
technology/telecommunications industries’ ability to supply it.
In early 2000, Cisco Systems, soaring on purchases of their $2,000 routers
and trading north of 100x forward P/E, stunned investors by announcing
that the demand for their equipment was finally slowing.8
At the same time, the telecom companies who had invested billions to build
out the fiber optics network finally conceded that some of that dark fiber
they had laid would never be lit for usage. - In
listening to Q3 quarterly commentary from Ai related companies, what
struck me was their inability to keep up with demand.
Amy Hood, Microsoft’s CFO, said during their recent earnings call that
‘we still have some work to do in our scale motions,’ thus acknowledging
that demand, particularly for Ai, was outpacing Microsoft’s current
capacity to deliver.9
This is just one example, but there are many others. - Ai
is a cost cutting tool. Ai has no health care costs.
Therefore, in my opinion, the pace of technological introduction in the
workplace will accelerate as Ai tools are better understood.
If that is the case, demand will not slow any time soon. - I
could be wrong, and the pivot in the demand/supply balance could come
sooner than I expect.
However, what’s important for all our investors to know is we will adjust
if that is the case.
Success in the investing world is the ability to recognize when you are
wrong and move on.
(God knows, I’ve had a few in my career.)
Yet at this juncture, I think it’s far too early to suggest the Ai rollout
is in the later stage.
Hence, we are sticking with companies that provide the Ai tools.
But we will be watching.
For our investors in the U.S., the Applied Equity team
wishes everyone a Happy Thanksgiving.
Andrew
Diesen Beitrag teilen: